Tag Archives: homosexual agenda

Second Mile “Program” Was Homosexual Agenda

Second Mile Charity Pushed Homosexual Agenda

Paul Drockton

As indicted pedophile groomer, Jerry Sandusky’s Charity, the Second Mile, continues to implode, allegations have been raised that he was pimping out youngsters to the rich and famous for sexual favors. Sandusky’s Charity was not a small entity. An estimated 100,000 children and adolescents went through his program. The number of potential victims is staggering.

Penn State University has more than one connection to Sandusky and his “program”.

“Prior to the summer of 2004,The Second Mile staff formed a partnership with The Pennsylvania State University’s Prevention Research Center to assess the intrapersonal and environmental factors of children served in the Summer Challenge Program. As a result, campers at the University Park site now are asked to complete a computer-based questionnaire, the Assessment of
Liability and Exposure to Substance Abuse and Antisocial Behavior (ALEXSA), during their stays at camp.”

The survey did not question the youth about sexual abuse, habits or molestation. Considering Sandusky’s previous record and exposure, this is a glaring omission. These surveys could also be used, in the wrong hands, to identify possible targets for sexual abuse by a pedophile ring. Possibly, even used by Sandusky and others to find youth that could be easily compromised or blackmailed into sex with adults.

As the MSM continues to look for a way out of this story, more victims continue to come forward. Sandusky’s charity, The Second Mile, had a substantial amount of corporate money flowing into it. Sponsors of one seven week camp-out alone put down $50,000 each to have their name on a campsite. These included Bank of America and State Farm Insurance in one instance.

According to its 2010 annual report, the largest category of the Second Mile’s revenues, 27 percent, came from events: $725,525 after expenses. Corporations gave $633,880, individuals gave $438,308 and foundations provided $361,783.

Other major donors listed on the charity’s report for 2010 include:

$50,000 or more:

Blake and Linda Gall
Bruce and Susan Heim and Keystone Real Estate Group
The Hershey Company
Highmark Foundation
Maier Family Foundation and Wilheim and Peggy Maier
Robert and Marilyn Mayer
Bob and Sandra Poole and The Poole Foundation
The Schreyer Foundation
Shaner Hotel Group and Lance and Ellen Shaner
Clyde and Nancy Shuman and Precision Medical, Inc.
Turner Construction Company
Warnaco Foundation

$20,000 to $49,900

Bank of America Charitable Foundation, Inc.
Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan
Computer Aid, Inc., the Salvaggio Family Foundation, and Tony Salvaggio
Ken and Celina Fox
The Hamer Foundation
Highmark Blue Shield
KVF Associates, Inc.
L.B. Smith Automotive Group and L.B Smith Estate Foundation
The Louis Silvi Foundation
Charles and Virginia Pearson
L. Edward and Beverly Sausman
Sheetz, Inc.
Philip and Judy Sieg
State Farm Companies Foundation

Another interesting tidbit of information comes from looking at the charity’s expenses. One thing the second mile promoted was an \anti-bullying\ kit for schools. The homosexual community is behind this effort nationwide. The same homosexual movement that is sponsored by the Satanic Psychopaths to destroy the American family. The effort is really designed to normalize homosexuality in our schools.

The charity also sponsored a mentorship program between college students and kids. The report does not mention a screening process designed to stop sexual predators from becoming mentors. According to one researcher:

“It is difficult to convey the dark side of the homosexual culture without appearing harsh,” wrote Baldwin. “However, it is time to acknowledge that homosexual behavior threatens the foundation of Western civilization – the nuclear family.”

Though the homosexual community and much of the media scoff at such accusations, Baldwin – who chaired the California Assembly’s Education committee, where he fought against support for the homosexual agenda in the state’s public schools – says in his report that homosexual activists’ “efforts to target children both for their own sexual pleasure and to enlarge the homosexual movement” constitute an “unmistakable” attack on “the family unit.”

Baldwin’s research is substantiated in a recently completed body of work written by Dr. Judith Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education and author of numerous authoritative books debunking sexual myths, including “Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences.”

In her thesis – also written for the Regent University Law Review – Reisman cited psychologist Eugene Abel, whose research found that homosexuals “sexually molest young boys with an incidence that is occurring from five times greater than the molestation of girls. …”

Abel also found that non-incarcerated “child molesters admitted from 23.4 to 281.7 acts per offender … whose targets were males.”

“The rate of homosexual versus heterosexual child sexual abuse is staggering,”
said Reisman, who was the principal investigator for an $800,000 Justice Department grant studying child pornography and violence. “Abel’s data of 150.2 boys abused per male homosexual offender finds no equal (yet) in heterosexual violations of 19.8 girls.”

Even more troubling, are reports that some leadership within the homosexual community actually promote pedophilia, without a strong vocal protest from other homosexual leadership:

* The Journal of Homosexuality recently published a special double-issue entitled, “Male Intergenerational Intimacy,” containing many articles portraying sex between men and minor boys as loving relationships. One article said parents should look upon the pedophile who loves their son “not as a rival or competitor, not as a theft of their property, but as a partner in the boy’s upbringing, someone to be welcomed into their home.”

* In 1995 the homosexual magazine “Guide” said, “We can be proud that the gay movement has been home to the few voices who have had the courage to say out loud that children are naturally sexual” and “deserve the right to sexual expression with whoever they choose. …” The article went on to say: “Instead of fearing being labeled pedophiles, we must proudly proclaim that sex is good, including children’s sexuality … we must do it for the children’s sake.”

* Larry Kramer, the founder of ACT-UP, a noted homosexual activist group, wrote in his book, “Report from the Holocaust: The Making of an AIDS Activist”: “In those instances where children do have sex with their homosexual elders, be they teachers or anyone else, I submit that often, very often, the child desires the activity, and perhaps even solicits it.”

* In a study of advertisements in the influential homosexual newspaper, The Advocate, Reisman found ads for a “Penetrable Boy Doll … available in three provocative positions. She also found that the number of erotic boy images in each issue of The Advocate averaged 14.

* Homosexual newspapers and travel publications advertise prominently for countries where boy prostitution is heavy, such as Burma, the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Thailand. (Ibid)

Universities have consistently promoted sexual deviancy through their curriculum and regular attacks on the traditional American family. They also provide a fertile environment for gross sexual experimentation. It would be very interesting to see how applicants were screened by the Second Mile for staff positions and mentorship programs.

Jerry Sandusky, the charity’s founder, is just one example when a homosexual pedophile is permitted unlimited access to our nation’s youth. Sadly, there are many others.

SOURCE

The real agenda behind gay anti-bullying clubs in your school


The real agenda behind gay anti-bullying clubs in your school

by Peter Baklinski

– Back in the early 1990’s most people in North America would have doubted there would ever come a day when the homosexual agenda would be accepted with open arms in elementary and high schools. Today however, that agenda is firmly implanted in public schools and is quickly making its way into Catholic schools, thanks to a well-planned strategy laid out by radical gay activists in 1995.

In the early 90’s Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered (GLBT) activists in Massachusetts sought to indoctrinate school children with homosexual values. GLBT activist Kevin Jennings, who was later appointed by President Obama as the assistant deputy secretary of the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools inside the Department of Education, masterminded the scheme of gay anti-bullying programs as a perfect inroad into the otherwise resistant classrooms of the nation.

“If the Radical Right can succeed in portraying us as preying on children, we will lose,”
warned Jennings in a 1995 speech to fellow GLBT activists outlining his strategy. “Their language–‘promoting homosexuality’–is laced with subtle and not-so-subtle innuendo that we are ‘after their kids.’”

Jennings argued that the key to success lay in “framing” the issue in another way, to the advantage of the GLBT cause.

The strategy consists in linking the GLBT cause to “universal values” that everyone in the community has in common, such as “safety.” One then builds on this universal value the idea that “homophobia” represents a “threat” to students’ safety since it creates a “climate where violence, name-calling, health problems, and suicide are common.” From this point, one simply promotes legislation and programs for schools that frames the GLBT agenda in the language of these universal values.

“This framing short-circuited their arguments and left them back-pedalling from day one,”
boasted Jennings. “[N]o one could speak up against our frame and say, ‘Why, yes, I do think students should kill themselves:’ This allowed us to set the terms for debate.

Jennings realized that this strategy would effectively throw any opposition into a defensive mode and steal their best line of attack. If anyone objected to the homosexual and transgender indoctrination that the activists planned to push in the schools, they would be accused of heartless disregard for students.

Despite the fact that it has been executed time and time again for almost two decades the methods and talking points have hardly changed at all. A recent policy to address “homophobic harassment and bullying, and homophobia and heterosexism” approved by the Board of Education in Burnaby, BC followed Jennings’ strategy precisely, right down to the language of “safety.”

Policy # 5.45 states that to “ensure that all members of the school community work together in an atmosphere of respect and safety regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, the Board of Education will adopt appropriate administrative regulations and strategies that promote respect for human rights, support diversity, and address discrimination.”

The final goal of the campaign, according to Jennings, is that one day when, “straight people” hear that someone is “promoting homosexuality,” he would say “‘Yeah, who cares?’ because they wouldn’t necessarily equate homosexuality with something bad that you would not want to promote.”

While much of the past 15 years has left the goals of the gay ant-bullying scheme carefully unspoken, a recent article in an online homosexual publication let the cat out of the bag.

“Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal?,” wrote Daniel Villarreal on Queerty.com, a website that promotes the gay agenda.

We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it. Recruiting children? You bet we are,” he added.

“I for one,”
continued Villarreal, “certainly want tons of school children to learn that it’s OK to be gay, that people of the same sex should be allowed to legally marry each other, and that anyone can kiss a person of the same sex without feeling like a freak. And I would very much like for many of these young boys to grow up and start f**ing men.”

SOURCE